The John in a Coma

Churlock's dog died when he was a kid is to me enough we don't need to have this weird convoluted tragic backstory. The underlying subtext of the final problem aligns better with john's point of view than churlocks and the evidence on the other side is also more compelling too. i would be more willing to buy it's all in john's head then Churlock because I think that the narrative supports his. There's too many themes about john and even the whole thing with charlie westborough the young man in the car who died there's a whole subtext about him dying because he couldn't come out to his conservative parents  who really love Margaret Thatcher