Justin: I'm done being snarky. It was funny until I sat here and I tried to seriously understand what was being said. We're talking about the instantiation of F alone G alone fundamental good or bad making properties. The best to the best of my ability it seems is if he's saying for something to be good or bad it requires more than just one thing. This is fucking that now I am mad now my optimism has been nice job Justin. Another reason to accept internalism again if you're not convinced already is that it helps us to solve a puzzle raised by Epicurus for this solution two chapters later. No. How many readers will have the willpower to just keep
David and Tamler welcome author and environmental science professor Jennifer Jacquet to the podcast to discuss the pros and cons of shame. What's the difference between shame and guilt? Is shaming effective for generating social progress or getting tax cheats to pay up? Is twitter shaming on the rise or on its way out? And what does David do when he's alone in the dark?
But before all of that, David and Tamler introduce a new way to support the podcast--through our Patreon account (patreon.com/verybadwizards). Plus, we discuss the retraction of a press release announcing that a professor agreed to referee a journal article (!) And can one passage get Tamler, the eternal optimist, to hate philosophy?
Links
Special Guest: Jennifer Jacquet.
Support Very Bad Wizards