12min chapter

Opening Arguments cover image

The Mifepristone Case Is an Insult to the Concept of Standing

Opening Arguments

CHAPTER

Absurd Arguments in the Mifepristone Case

The chapter delves into the absurd arguments presented in the Supreme Court regarding the Mifepristone case, emphasizing the safety and benefits of the medication for medical abortions while critiquing the manufactured claims of harm. It discusses the lawsuit involving individuals protesting against medical abortion availability, highlighting the questionable standing theory and the broader impact on legal cases. The chapter also explores the changes in FDA regulations for Mifepristone, controversies surrounding its accessibility via telemedicine, and the implications of restrictions on its distribution.

00:00

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode