Government Schools

6min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Reparations for black Americans would cost up to 11 trillion dollars. Would that tank the economy? I don't know, it seems like it has to have some effect. But if we have government schools, the government has no business discriminating on the basis of wealth,. which is cisely what they're doing by basing the quality of an education based on income level. The department of ed ion was not started until 19 79 thand there was no such thing as universal education in this country until quite recently. We need a head start or a rigorous, robust education in public schools. And i'd rather say people not taxed on the income they would use then to send their children to private

In this conversation with Jason Hill based on his book What do White Americans Owe Black People? Racial Justice in the Age of Post-Oppression, Shermer probes the philosopher on the arguments for and against reparations.

In this provocative and highly original work, philosophy professor Jason Hill explores multiple dimensions of race in America today, but most importantly, a black-white divide which has grown exponentially over the past decade.

Central to his thesis, Hill calls on black American leaders (and their white liberal sponsors) to escape from the cycle of blame and finger-pointing, which seeks to identify black failures with white hatred and indifference. This overblown narrative is promulgated by a phalanx of black nihilists who advocate the destruction of America and her institutions in the name of ending “whiteness.” Much of the black intelligentsia consists of these false prophets, and it is their poisonous ideology which is taught, uncontradicted, to students of all races. It is they who are responsible for the cultural depression blacks are suffering in today’s society.

Ultimately, the answer to “what do White Americans owe?” is not about the morality or practicality of reparations, affirmative action, or other redistributionist schemes. Hill rejects the collectivist premise behind the argument, instead couching notions of culpability, justice, and fairness as responsibilities of individuals, not arbitrary racial or ethnic groupings.