The Rule of Necessity and Presidential Decision Making

Exploring the historical context of the rule of necessity through the impeachment trial of Andrew Johnson, the chapter highlights how individuals with conflicts of interest can participate for equal representation. It delves into constitutional interpretations, historical conflicts like a judge's objection to an income tax, and hypothetical scenarios involving presidential immunity and the statute of limitations. The discussion touches on presidential pardons, the concept of self-pardoning, and the complexities of late-term executive decisions.