The Sign of Desire Is Never Signifying, Ye?

Ause this may be a paraphrase, but theres the sign of desire is never signifying, ye? I mean, that's in gatre when he says, we've heard this from time imemorial, that no desire without thela. And guatri does not have any of that. I wonder if this binding desire to the signifier too, has anything with simulation and baudrier, maybe tat. But, e, but still, desire is thought of as as in this dialectical wedding with the law. The whole wagering on jesus resurrection. That's the universalism that paul tries to erect.