There are people of faith who are scientists, and that's a model for those people who do not want to give up their faith. I really lovei mean, he was one of the the pioneers of de bunking a intelligent design, creationism,. The whole theory about irreducible perplexity and the bacterial sagelum. And i think if you go down that path, you're missing what they mean by it. It's a religious truth, not empirical truth. But then the question is, why should i believe it? Which is it acceptable to believe which you can prove in an empirical sense? Yes, that's ratfirs nod for those altars examples.
Michael Shermer speaks with Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer about the key psychological explanations for science denial and doubt that can help provide a means for improving scientific literacy and understanding — critically important at a time when denial has become deadly. Sinatra and Hofer offer tools for addressing science denial and explain both the importance of science education and its limitations, show how science communicators may inadvertently contribute to the problem, and explain how the internet and social media foster misinformation and disinformation. The authors focus on key psychological constructs such as reasoning biases, social identity, epistemic cognition, and emotions and attitudes that limit or facilitate public understanding of science, and describe solutions for individuals, educators, science communicators, and policy makers. If you have ever wondered why science denial exists, want to know how to understand your own biases and those of others, and would like to address the problem, this book will provide the insights you are seeking.