The Differences Between GPT3 and Humans

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The depth that at least GPT3 exhibits is lesser than the depth that a human has on, you know, if a human that studies one topic can achieve more depth than a GPT3 of today. Of course, we expect future GPTs to increase their depth as well. But that seems like almost a qualitative difference between these neural nets and humans. Human beings are also extremely selective about the information they consume,.

Read the full transcript here.

Can machines actually be intelligent? What sorts of tasks are narrower or broader than we usually believe? GPT-3 was trained to do a "single" task: predicting the next word in a body of text; so why does it seem to understand so many things? What's the connection between prediction and comprehension? What breakthroughs happened in the last few years that made GPT-3 possible? Will academia be able to stay on the cutting edge of AI research? And if not, then what will its new role be? How can an AI memorize actual training data but also generalize well? Are there any conceptual reasons why we couldn't make AIs increasingly powerful by just scaling up data and computing power indefinitely? What are the broad categories of dangers posed by AIs?

Ilya Sutskever is Co-founder and Chief Scientist of OpenAI, which aims to build artificial general intelligence that benefits all of humanity. He leads research at OpenAI and is one of the architects behind the GPT models. Prior to OpenAI, Ilya was co-inventor of AlexNet and Sequence to Sequence Learning. He earned his Ph.D. in Computer Science from the University of Toronto. Follow him on Twitter at @ilyasut.

Staff