We saw the foundation of its management. Is it? It isn't why you cannot disentangle risk management thrown etics, just as you cannotdisentangle e or ou economic some more philosophy. Jus mento sad about the same time isocratis and hilel was now the same time, and still several centuries separating themr between is Democratis and Hilel. I want to go back to hamarabiand and the builder o, the architectr. And before we do, i just want to mention, because it's just a pet peeve of mine, that in a in the book of exodus, when as an eye for an eye and a
Nassim Taleb of NYU-Poly talks with EconTalk host Russ Roberts about his recent paper (with Constantine Sandis) on the morality and effectiveness of "skin in the game." When decision makers have skin in the game--when they share in the costs and benefits of their decisions that might affect others--they are more likely to make prudent decisions than in cases where decision-makers can impose costs on others. Taleb sees skin in the game as not just a useful policy concept but a moral imperative. The conversation closes with some observations on the power of expected value for evaluating predictions along with Taleb's thoughts on economists who rarely have skin in the game when they make forecasts or take policy positions.