The supreme court of the united states has a very specific name for this phen non of respecting its precedence. The question with star decisis is not, you know, retain precedent, or do you just ignore precedent and rule whatever you want? It's always going to be somewhere in between. In 19 92, casey laid out a very careful set of factors to weigh in thinking about whether or not precedent should be followed.
Not explicitly, no. But neither is the right to travel from New York to New Jersey. NYU law professor Kenji Yoshino explains our unenumerated rights.
This episode was produced by Victoria Chamberlin, edited by Matt Collette, fact-checked by Laura Bullard, engineered by Paul Mounsey, and hosted by Sean Rameswaram.
Transcript at vox.com/todayexplained
Support Today, Explained by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices