I've attended many of his speeches, usually in these little hotel rooms with a couple o dozen people. Most of the speech ended up not being about some aspect of world war two or the holycost. It was about how the traditional enemy, the jews and the media, are trying to silence him. And also, often in these debates, they, you know, we're often confronted with the most extreme examples. So holicorse denial being an obvious example ofo, a reason why we should er, we should not have the free speech protections that we have because of this really extreme example. But the problem of that is, where does it end? I mean, already,
Political Correctness has formed the basis for a new intolerant mindset, actively policing speech that is deemed offensive or controversial. Rather than confront bad ideas through discussion, it has now become common to intimidate one’s detractors into silence. Taking on board legitimate concerns about how speech can be harmful, Andrew Doyle argues that the alternative — an authoritarian world in which our freedoms are surrendered to those in power — has far worse consequences.