Is There a Better Way to Understand Constitutional Law?

If you understand it in the correct way, it gives you other avenues for e for challenging certain laws. What we're claiming is that there is a logic to existing supreme court doctrine that is unrecognized by many, many law professors and then also judges. I didn't understand the difference until i litigated the rage case. Inr i came to understand this in a way that other law professors don't. And that allowed me to formulate the argument in the obamacar case. Other law professors who collapsed at all into the commerce clause thought our argument was gobbledyguick.