Evolutionary psychology has been criticized for positing something that nobody has remotely provided any sort of biological account of how this could possibly be true. So the mean thing is whether you're hungry or not, and socio economic status is a proxy for determining hunger. Both socio economic status and hunger are ways to measure people who are resource lacking in resources.
The less we know, the more we know it. David and Tamler talk about the notorious Dunning-Kruger effect, which makes us overconfident in beliefs on topics we're ignorant about and under-confident when we're experts. Plus, we break down an evolutionary psychology article on why poor men and hungry men prefer women with big breasts. Trust us, it's a really bad study. We're sure about it.
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: