In this episode, Patrick McKenzie (@patio11) responds to a recent request by a crypto unicorn founder / bank CEO to retract his essay Debanking (and debunking?). Come for the note about editorial standards and independence, stay for the diss track.
–
Full transcript available here: https://www.complexsystemspodcast.com/editorial-standards-and-independence/
–
Sponsors: Safebase | Check
Ready to save time and close deals faster? Inbound security reviews shouldn’t slow down your team or your sales cycle. Leading companies use SafeBase to eliminate up to 98% of inbound security questionnaires, automate workflows, and accelerate pipeline. Go to safebase.io/podcast
Check is the leading payroll infrastructure provider and pioneer of embedded payroll. Check makes it easy for any SaaS platform to build a payroll business, and already powers 60+ popular platforms. Head to checkhq.com/complex and tell them patio11 sent you.
–
Recommended in this episode:
–
Twitter:
@patio11
–
Timestamps:
(00:00) Intro
(03:04) Musical interlude
(04:56) Return to commentary
(06:35) You can’t please everyone
(08:06) The bar for retraction is high
(10:07) Our review of the retraction request
(10:37) “A few areas were incorrect or misleading”
(16:12) “Lots of omission of key facts”
(18:57) “Missing the point about what we mean by debunking”
(20:40) Sponsors: Safebase | Check
(25:00) Our response to McCauley’s testimony
(28:24) McCauley’s concluding remarks and our response
(30:21) Bank CEOs do not often ask writers for retractions
(34:20) Some context regarding custodial banks
(40:50) Returning to our regularly scheduled programming
