Sceptical Theism

Naturallism has a very good predictive theory of the fact. It's not thatit as just as this theory is consistent. But i want to move on now to sceptical theism, because, i mean, we could discuss every single one of these topics. We we could discuss forever. I thinkta a mistaken epistemic position to say that you can respond to criticisms of how a theory under explains or incorrectly explains of data without saying how your preferred theory does it better. Ist absolutely wrong. Simply demonstrating the consistency of your preferred theory with the facts does not demonstrate that it is a good explanation of the facts.