Clinton vs Ducacus

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Trompis: Clinton won with, i think, forty two % of the voters. To te ammen, he won with a stantial minority of the vote because of how many votes progot. The campaign was very effective at focusing all they had on a, hammering home the fact that this elite, a out o touch republican, george w. Bush doesn't care about you and don't care about the fact that we're in a recession. Ah, ah, it was basicallycap sing on the economic fundamentals with this kind of flunky third party cannse that turned out to be quite potent.

Shermer and Rosenfeld discuss: why we have a duopoly • gerrymandering • voting restrictions • how we know all elections are not rigged • abortion • immigration • US foreign policy • the rise of conservative and liberal think tanks • ideology • political polarization • political leanings of industrialists vs. tech billionaires and rural poor vs. urban poor • Trump and 2016, 2020, and 2024 (are we facing civil unrest as never seen before?), and more…

Sam Rosenfeld is Associate Professor of Political Science at Colgate University, specializing in party politics and American political development. His research interests include the history of political parties, the intersection of social movements and formal politics, and the politics of social and economic policymaking. His book, The Polarizers: Postwar Architects of Our Partisan Era (University of Chicago Press, 2018), offers an intellectual and institutional history of party polarization in the postwar United States. With Daniel Schlozman at Johns Hopkins University, he is currently writing a book on party development since the Founding, provisionally titled The Hollow Parties. His writing has also appeared in The American Prospect, Boston Review, Democracy, The New Republic, The New York Times, Politico, The Washington Post, and Vox.