Are You on the Side of the Two, or Are You on the Side of the Multiply?

There is a certain relevance to this notion of infinite deconstruction, at least in the house language, right? I don't know if this is even related. Cause there's an ethical thinking argument that yo ake relativeo alterity. The idea of taking a philosophical text and prepping it before putting it through axioms does feel like the real et cetera. But then you create something based on these new rules which can't be just fleshing out what non philosophy can do. This is kind of where i see what larwell was bringing up with Larwell and non standard philosophy. In the early works of larwell, he's smashing together de lus and del