And i just want to throw in something i i realized recently, is that there's many reasons to dispute the age of the bible as its been given to us in the of the stories of it, including the old testament. But one of the reasons is that there is a powerful symbolic link between the idea of melchisedec as described in the old testament, and polaris an astro theology. And polaris was not considered the pole star until at least the thirt century. And before that, it was beta urse minoris, part of one of the dippers. So just that fact alone, that they're talking about malchisede in an astro theological way as the pole star, malchesedec being polaris ina astrology, proves that this, this system that the vaticans laid out, they've probably inserted, or they've probably revised history to make themselves look like they've been in charge longer than they really were. And what we can even trust about history is very dubious. Beyond, ah, even just a few generations back. It's pretty crazy. Whyl

ye, i mean, if you look at o look at the state of our media, i mean, ifo just imagine that in knaw compound, not over thousands of years of history, and you'll know how much of history you can just take on face value, including theological history. And it doesn't matter what religion you look at. And what you're saying, gabriel, too key, is that these symbols that have been used by evil archies and cults and political tyrants and things like that throughout history. They were coopted. And this is something i keep having to let people know about, because they'll see a symbol of a pyramid, they'll see a bol of something that looks evil to them because it was maybe used, or at least we were told about that being evil. And they don't understand that it's not the symbol itself. The symbol itself has an ancient history that goes well before any of that. Ah, and that the way that evil operates. Because schopathles. Just look at a psychopath. The psychopath lacks what it lacks empathy, right? Which is why the psychopath can operate as a predator amongst its own kind without any moral quibbles, right? Ah, because there is no empathy for life or nature, for their fellow men. And with the cutting off of that empathy, there's also no creativity, because empathy and creativity work hand in hand. And so what the dark side has to do, just to keep it simple, is they have they can't create their own symbolism. They can't create their own religious traditions. They can't create their own cults and their own rituals and their own rights and their own political ems and their own economic systems. They don't have it in them. What they can do though, is they can coopt what good people create. It, take the best of it, warp it, repackage it and then bring it back to the public in a way that's more, ah, eye catching, you know, like the big fla shing lights and the whole thing. And when you recognize that their religion is a cult of power, a cult of power in this domain, then they are going to look for the best, the symbols that attract you the most, the places, the houses of light and truth and health and law and justice, that you would go to. We should have a legal system, we should have a medical group. We should have these things. But, ah, they co op that because we trust that. And that's why, chapter seven, i brought up the question of trust. And maybe i can get both of your comments on this principle, maybe gabriel, starting with you, because it's all about where you place your trust, right?

Yan?

If you don't have trust within who you are and the connection to the divine, to spirit, to god, to the kingdom of heaven, however you want to look at that, if you don't have that connection to trust, that voice, then you're actually doomed to be constantly giving out your trust to people that, let's just put it nicely, don't deserve that trust, right? So what do you think about that concept of trust and the misplacing of our trust? Man, thank you for handing this over to me.