We tend to assume everyone's minds are like much more like our own than they really are, this is the idea of the typical mind fallacy. For almost any trait you could imagine, people actually differ on that trait and their internal experiences can be wildly different. On the other hand, there's also this sense in which humans copy each other to such a high degree that this sort of space of like different actions you can take is way more constrained than you might imagine.
Read the full transcript here.
What is the Great Rationality Debate? What are axiomatic rationality and ecological rationality? How irrational are people anyway? What's the connection between rationality and wisdom? What are some of the paradigms in cognitive science? Why do visual representations of information often communicate their meaning much more effectively than other kinds of representations?
Anna Riedl is a cognitive scientist with a primary research interest in judgement and decision-making under unmeasurable uncertainty, a field in the intersection of psychology, neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. She loves the scientific method so much that she regularly spreads her joy about it in various formats of science communication. In the end, she cares about ideas being applied in the real world, solving problems, and benefitting humanity. This means she often plays the role of being an interface between the two worlds of ideas and their application by humans. Over the last years, she has founded and lead different organizations in the DACH region that work on improving the world. You can find more about her at riedlanna.com, follow her on Twitter at @annaleptikon, or email her at annariedl.office@gmail.com.
Further reading:
Staff
Music
Affiliates