Are There Generational Differences in Predicting People's Futures?

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Is there generational differences in predicting people, predicting their future lives? There's much talk now about how igeners are very different. A landmark study published in lancet planetary health journal found that 56% of young people believe humanity is doomed. The number one reason for this was confusion and anger over the failure of government to take significant action on climate change. In general, more people express more fear or worry about the future then hope or optimism, than we have seen in the past.

Shermer speaks with world-renowned future forecaster and game designer, Jane McGonigal, about her book Imaginable in which she draws on the latest scientific research in psychology and neuroscience to show us how to train our minds to think the unthinkable and imagine the unimaginable by inviting us to play with provocative thought experiments and future simulations.

Shermer and McGonigal discuss: what a futurist is and what they do; counterfactuals: predicting the past; how could the present moment be different?; how can you imagine the unimaginable, or think the unthinkable?; how to envision what our lives will look like ten years from now; how to to solve problems creatively; how to make decisions that will help shape the future we desire; how to simulate any future you want; simulations as thought experiments as counterfactual causality tests; gaming as simulation of problem solving; the 10,000-hour rule for success; your present self vs. your future self and why most of us discount the future too much.