Unpacking Political Misinformation in Debates

This chapter analyzes the accuracy of statements made by a political candidate during a recent debate, focusing on misinformation around controversial topics such as elections and health. It critiques the moderators' approaches to fact-checking and highlights the implications of these biases on public perception and political discussions, especially in relation to abortion rights and fracking. The discussion underscores the need for clearer policy proposals and the impact of candidates’ rhetoric on their debate performances.