I Don't Know Purely of Belief

I just think that there's I think one idea is actually about the like activity of passivity and then one is about pure passivity, right? Like the whole like dialectical thinking through examples. And I think that Pascal example is on the side of purely of belief and and and the so I don’t know that I just don't know that those two things. What do you mean purely of belief? I'm just don't understand what you know like so purely the way that he talks about belief as being the like giving over to the illusion without right without without owner.