
SCOTUS Leans on Constitutional Avoidance in United States v. Hansen
Cato Podcast
00:00
Introduction
Cater: A law criminalizing some speech encouraging people to violate immigration law passes Supreme Court muster, sorta. Cater: Many questions about the interpretation of that law have been left unanswered. In part, thanks to the High Court's reliance on so-called constitutional avoidance. It was Tommy Barry's comments on the High Court ruling.
Play episode from 00:00
Transcript


