Cato Podcast cover image

SCOTUS Leans on Constitutional Avoidance in United States v. Hansen

Cato Podcast

00:00

Introduction

Cater: A law criminalizing some speech encouraging people to violate immigration law passes Supreme Court muster, sorta. Cater: Many questions about the interpretation of that law have been left unanswered. In part, thanks to the High Court's reliance on so-called constitutional avoidance. It was Tommy Barry's comments on the High Court ruling.

Play episode from 00:00
Transcript

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app