Do we live inside a simulated reality or a pocket universe embedded in a larger structure about which we know virtually nothing? Is consciousness a purely physical matter, or might it require something extra, something nonphysical? According to the philosopher Eric Schwitzgebel, itâs hard to say. In The Weirdness of the World, Schwitzgebel argues that the answers to these fundamental questions lie beyond our powers of comprehension. We can be certain only that the truthâwhatever it isâis weird. Philosophy, he proposes, can aim to openâto reveal possibilities we had not previously appreciatedâor to close, to narrow down to the one correct theory of the phenomenon in question. Schwitzgebel argues for a philosophy that opens.
According to Schwitzgebelâs âUniversal Bizarrenessâ thesis, every possible theory of the relation of mind and cosmos defies common sense. According to his complementary âUniversal Dubietyâ thesis, no general theory of the relationship between mind and cosmos compels rational belief. Might the United States be a conscious organism â a conscious group mind with approximately the intelligence of a rabbit? Might virtually every action we perform cause virtually every possible type of future event, echoing down through the infinite future of an infinite universe? What, if anything, is it like to be a garden snail? Schwitzgebel makes a persuasive case for the thrill of considering the most bizarre philosophical possibilities.
Shermer and Schwitzgebel discuss: bizarreness ⢠skepticism ⢠consciousness ⢠virtual reality ⢠AI, Turing Test, sentience, existential threat ⢠idealism, materialism ⢠ultimate nature of reality ⢠solipsism ⢠evidence for the existence of an external world ⢠computer simulations hypothesis ⢠mind-body problem ⢠truths: external, internal, objective, subjective ⢠mind-altering drugs ⢠entropy ⢠causality ⢠infinity ⢠immortality ⢠multiverses ⢠why there is something rather than nothing.
Eric Schwitzgebel is professor of philosophy at the University of California, Riverside. He is the author of A Theory of Jerks and Other Philosophical Misadventures; Perplexities of Consciousness; and Describing Inner Experience?