The Underlying Claim Is an Anti-Clan Statute, Right?

The lawsuit was brought by nine plaintiffs who were harmed, people who got hurt at the rally. Most of the plaintiffs were physically injured in the car attack but they are seeking damages for emotional and social ramifications. Was there a conspiracy? Was it motivated by racial animus? And were overt acts of violence committed? And did those acts of violence harm these people in a way that entitles them to damages? That's all the jury has to decide.