Why Nice Is Relevant?

Karl yung was the guy, i think, who said that mita killed philosophy and gave birth to psychology. He felt that nitu represented kind of the end of philosophy and its being swallowed or consumed by psychology. So why care about nice in sort of the twentiet of the 20 first century? And is he relevant at all, too lives to day? Well, ok, so there's a few ways i could take that. In terms of why back and read nita is, i would situate it within a larger sort of ethic that i try to embody,. which is to a read the greatest minds who ever lived.