I tend to think that it's one of those things where it relies on a crucial point in this argument is that there are these sort of somewhat mysterious notions. We just can't make sense of quying the person who was influential in which his attack was making it in the 50s. So Klein is trying to give a suspect room rather than just a two options. That thinks to be more or less central to our belief structure. But are you advocating this or mentioning that there are people who advocate it? Because it does not sound very convincing to me.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode