Starks could be interactive would that mean then you're having a conversation back and forth between proven verifier until there's like a probabilistic yes but probably better it would be to use a blockchain okay the transparency in a stark means that all the verifier ever sends is basically public randomness. This actually has a lot of benefits both from the theoretical point of view because it means that actually the systems are a little bit safer. You only need collision resistant hash functions as opposed to using the random oracle hypothesis. Another even more practical implication is that you could conceivably work with such a stark with a lower security parameter so you could work with a probability of error of only let's say

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode