Starks could be interactive would that mean then you're having a conversation back and forth between proven verifier until there's like a probabilistic yes but probably better it would be to use a blockchain okay the transparency in a stark means that all the verifier ever sends is basically public randomness. This actually has a lot of benefits both from the theoretical point of view because it means that actually the systems are a little bit safer. You only need collision resistant hash functions as opposed to using the random oracle hypothesis. Another even more practical implication is that you could conceivably work with such a stark with a lower security parameter so you could work with a probability of error of only let's say