This chapter delves into the allegations of antisemitism tied to the ICC's warrant for Netanyahu, navigating the complex definitions and perceptions surrounding the issue. The discussion critiques the historical and contemporary implications of international law, focusing on military conduct and accountability for war crimes, particularly in the context of Israel's actions in Gaza. Through contrasting views on humanitarian conditions and the validity of surveys related to the siege, the speakers explore the challenges of addressing genuine antisemitism in the current political landscape.
The ICC has requested an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu concerning possible war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Israel-Hamas War. Is it fair to put his actions on the same level as Hamas? Those who disagree argue that the ICC doesn’t have legal jurisdiction in this case and it’s politically motivated. Those who agree argue it’s a necessary step in enforcing international law and holding accountability. Now we debate: Is the ICC’s Warrant Against Netanyahu Justified?
Arguing Yes: Kenneth Roth, Former Executive Director of Human Rights Watch; Professor at the Princeton School of International Affairs
Arguing No: Eugene Kontorovich, Law Professor at George Mason University; Executive Director of Scalia Law School’s Center for the Middle East and International Law
Xenia Wickett, Geopolitical strategist, moderator at Wickett Advisory, and Trustee of Transparency International UK, is the guest moderator.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices