Why India's Not Generated So Many Formal Jobs?

I want you to tell me where you think i might get wrong. I would suggest that jatte indogamy remains important because so many people are in very precarious livelihoods. 70 % of India's landholdings are less than one hector, which is partly because there is a maximum landholding to break up the zamindar system. So at low levels of development, can democracy be hijacked? Bi, say, a labor aristocracy, which ultimately thwarts long teme development. Is democracy always grow groot for growth? Or might it vary? For example, where in eustasia?