Teleological Foundationalism

M, would you mind just bringing up that slive one more time? Am, i think we'll all just leave infinitism and coherentism. If somebody wants to bring that in the c and a, we can talk about it. I just want to briefly mention why i think a teism is better off here. So if you look at that middle column, it's what i call teleological foundationism. That's the view that i myself hold. It doesn't require further explanation. Or if you prefer, you might say it explains itself. But either way, we don't something that calls out for explanation but lacks one. And these natural regularities are ultimately going to