Is There a Cost Benefit to a Robotic Weapon?

I don't see any reason why i wouldn't become autonymous, just with the way w general trends are going. I would say it's a very good point, ma'am. We knew these were going to be weapons like that's why they were being developed. And then we also have to ask ourselves, like civilization has to ask itself, a cost benefit here? Does this kind of repproach? It's a cost benefit, right? does this kind of proach save more lives than it will inevitably harm?