Do Two Things at Once With This

Paul Eisenstein: Sartre doesn't see the fundamental web of agreement that is in the background of everything that he's saying. He does start from like way far out for his idea to help to explain the nothing. So, but he does, but he doesn't start far back enough,. I don't know that he could have sustained the things that he say, he says - which is why structurally, there can't be unconscious for him. But even when you're wrong, he kind of has it right in a way, right? Like I think there's something pretty great about that.