Comparative Judgment in Assessing Student Writing

The chapter explains the process of comparative judgment for assessing students' writing in primary education through a national collection of student responses. It discusses how teachers rank students based on age-standardized scores, categorize their writing proficiency levels, and the reliability of the system in smaller vs. larger teacher moderation groups. The effectiveness and practical benefits of Comparative Judgement over traditional methods in evaluating student work are emphasized, along with strategies for maximizing its benefits in schools.