Did the quinian turn in analytic philosophy turn out to be a dead end? Yes. Why? Let me see if i can try to talk this through. Qwine went into his programme thinking that what you start with is people agreeing and disagreeing with things, right? And so yet, i think it wasn't going to go where he thought it was going to go. Are we living in a simulation? I actually think i have an argument that not. The comedian dave barry has a really funny riff. He's also one of the best philosophers.
What can studying the lives of philosophers tell us about how to organize and interpret our own lives? Elijah Millgram is a professor of philosophy at the University of Utah whose research focuses on the theory of rationality. His latest book, John Stuart Mill and The Meaning of Life, analyzes the relationship between the ideas of the famous theorist and their impacts on Mill’s life. His forthcoming book examines the life and work of Frederich Nietzsche through a similar lens, combining philosophical analysis and biography.
Elijah joined Tyler to discuss Newcomb’s paradox, the reason he doesn’t have an opinion about everything, the philosophy of Dave Barry, style and simulation theory, why philosophers aren’t often consulted about current events, his best stories from TA-ing for Robert Nozick, the sociological correlates of knowing formal logic, the question of whether people are more interested in truth or being interesting, philosophical cycles, what makes Nietzsche important today, the role that meaning can play in a person’s personality and life, Mill on Bentham, the idea of true philosophy as dialogue, the extent to which modern philosophers are truly philosophical, why he views aesthetics as critical to philosophy, and more.
Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video.
Recorded May 11th, 2021 Other ways to connect