4min chapter

Open to Debate cover image

Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?

Open to Debate

CHAPTER

The Non-Originalist Supreme Court

John Avlon: Many, many of the Warren Court decisions are justifiable on the basis of originalism. The current court purporting to rely on originalism, they consistently reach results that line up perfectly with the policy preferences of the Republican Party., he says. Avlon: Non-dominantism is not constraining them at all; it's empowering their activism because it discourages judicial modesty. "I defy Tom to show me where Justice Alito ... made an originalist argument in that case"

00:00

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode