The Ethics of Law Isn't the Ethics of the Law

I mean, no, innocent and guilty isn't what's happening here exet a civil case. But like, you don't have to sayoh, no, he didn't defame people like you can just try to mitigate the damage in itemeit right? Way, if lawyers can give a defence they don't personally believe, they don’t have to believe. Its not the ethics of law does not ire that. It just has to be a legally responsible and violable argument. Their personal be belief is actually not relevant to it. So as long as they are mounting an ethical defence, it's fine. And i think that i might speak to the quality of the