Psychologist published a study in one of the top pireview journals, and it couldn't be replicated. So this is a question of sort of a signal detection problem. Is that a hit or a not? And i always have, not just me, but others, with remote viewing, is that the targets are too fuzzy. The original journal wouldn't publish their failed replication because journals don't want an failed replications. They want cool, sexy studies like bem's.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode