Psychologists often make these arguments. They we just't, don't often know that that's what we're doing. You can try to use them for other forms of knowledge, like reasoning. But there are special reasons why it's already hard to know whether there's a right answerin in the moral domain or inan ivaluative domain. Whether you believe there is a right like a fact of the matter. And if there is a fact ofthe matter, whether or not we have the right ones, it's just slipperer. So in arguments, i think, have more power in that.
What happens when we discover why we believe the things we believe? What if we discover that our values are the product of our cultural tradition, or personal experience, or natural selection? Should we be more skeptical of our values once we learn their history? Plus, data on Google porn searches reveal that you're all a bunch of sick fucks.
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: