The Costs of Unacceptable Things

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

I think we have to make these decisions assuming that the group you least want to be is eventually in power. And I really think that changes the equation. Thinking that way pushes me towards thinking things like, okay, there should be a certain set of things that are unacceptable to say and will cause someone to get band or kicked off platform. It's just because I don't trust people to moderate the truth. Like time and time again they've proven that they're not that reliable.

Read the full transcript here.

Is our adoption of beliefs primarily motivated by wanting to be the heroes of our own stories? Why do we have such a hard time understanding the stories other people are telling about themselves and the world? How can we reduce political polarization? How plausible are the various theories (conspiracy or otherwise) around the origins of COVID? Why don't the EA, Rationalist, and related communities focus more on transforming political landscapes? Free speech is incredibly important, of course; but does absolute free speech tip the scales in favor of misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda? Has the internet fundamentally changed the way we converse with each other, or has it merely scaled up and accelerated those conversations while preserving their original characteristics? Is there ultimately a way to land on a principled answer around free speech and censorship? Does a globally optimum free speech policy even exist, or are we stuck picking from a lineup of equally unsavory options?

Cate Hall is a co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of Alvea, a newly clinical stage EA biotech company. She is also the co-founder and President of Juniper Ventures, a biosecurity and pandemic preparedness foundry. She is a former Supreme Court litigator and former no. 1 female poker player in the world. She tweets at @catehall.

Staff