i'd struggle to figure out what this debate turns on, like, what are the stakes of it? What are the truth makers of it? You know, both of them say we need to have this concept of evil that' that's categorically different. Well, ye, if if not disrespectful, i mean maybe, i know a lot of people think that, and younow, they get upset. Don't call, like,what the nois did evil. Peple s like josh nob its oi take it.
David and Tamler descend into the dark pits of Hell to look Satan in the eyes and discover the nature of evil. OK…that’s not fully accurate, we just read and talk about a couple of philosophy articles that analyze the concept. What are the features of evil people and acts? Does evil just mean ‘really really really really bad’ or is it categorically different in some way? Can you be evil without ever actually causing harm? Is Tony Soprano evil?
Plus we take a "moral alignment" quiz (inspired by role playing games like Dungeons and Dragons). We both want to end up as ‘chaotic good’ but does it turn out that way? And what kind of character is a unicorn?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: