Trial Proceedings and Defense Strategies

The chapter explores the trial proceedings of Maria and Albert's case, focusing on the defense's attempt to shift public opinion by portraying Maria negatively. It delves into the strategies employed by the prosecution and defense to sway the jury's perception, including the argument of Albert's alleged history of sleepwalking. The discussion also analyzes the evidence and behaviors to question the plausibility of the sleepwalking defense and highlights the circumstantial evidence pointing towards Albert's guilt.