Dobbs vs. The Court of Appeals

The court could address the scope or existence of the right to an apportion recognized in roverss wade and k c. That is a possibility that that we could have the court saying, you now, we don't like this procedureor mechanism, but on the merits, let's have it on the merits,. And we don't think that this should be recognized here. If it were right at stake, i really don't think it would be tolerated. Like if california, you know, to morrow, said there should be immediate civil damages for any church that doesn't perform a gay marriage rigt. Any one who is affected by that, who has a friend who