Is Dualism Adaptable?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

There's some people that speculate belief in the afterlife is an adaptive feature, because then it reduces anxiety about death. I think you can explain dualism just by the two other engines: intuitive physics and theory of mind. And each of those systems is only adaptive. It's only adaptive for a child to know, what is an objective is, what is the body of their mother? Look at their mother as that a single entity is supposed to say,. If you only see my torso now, know that I also, you know, if you saw my legs separately, that's the same person. We are what our brain tells us. Right.

The Blind Storyteller is an intellectual journey that draws on philosophy, anthropology, linguistics, cognitive science, and Berent’s own cutting-edge research. It grapples with a host of provocative questions, from why we are so afraid of zombies, to whether dyslexia is “just in our heads,” from what happens to us when we die, to why we are so infatuated with our brains. The end result is a startling new perspective on the age-old nature/nurture debate — and on what it means to be human.

Shermer and Berent discuss: nature/nurture genes/environment biology/culture • language and innate knowledge • what babies are born knowing • how people reason about human nature • dualism • essentialism • theory of mind • the nature of the self • innate beliefs in the soul and afterlife • free will and determinism • how people think about mental illness and disorders • how one’s theory of human nature effects one’s attitudes about nearly everything.

Iris Berent is a Professor of Psychology at Northeastern University, Boston, and the Director of the Language and Mind Lab. Berent’s research has examined how the mind works and how we think it does. She is the author of dozens of groundbreaking scientific publications and the recipient of numerous research grants. Her previous book, The Phonological Mind (Cambridge, 2013), was hailed by Steven Pinker as a “brilliant and fascinating analysis of how we produce and interpret sound.”