The Interplay of Science and Philosophy in Understanding Reality

Greg answers questions from callers on the transcendental argument, the scapegoat theory of the atonement that’s popular in progressive circles, and an objection an atheist would make to Greg’s “blind beach-writer” argument for intelligent design.   Topics:

1. What’s your opinion on the transcendental argument? (03:00)
2. What response can I give to the scapegoat theory of the atonement that’s popular in progressive circles, which is against penal substitution and is more political in how it frames the implications of the atonement? (30:00)
3. What objection would an atheist make to the comparison between Dawkins’s blind watchmaker and Koukl’s blind beach-writer, and how would you respond? (47:00)

Mentioned on the Show: 

• Be One of the 100 – Become a strategic partner
• Reality Student Apologetics Conference – September 12–13 in Atlanta, GA; October 17–18 in Seattle, WA; November 7–8 in Minneapolis, MN; February 20–21, 2026 in Dallas, TX; March 13–14, 2026 in Philadelphia, PA; April 24–25, 2026 in Los Angeles, CA
• Why the Blood? by Greg Koukl

Related Links:

• Philosophical Naturalism Limits Science by Amy Hall
• But What If God Did Do It? by Amy Hall