Constitutional Interpretation: Originalism vs. Living Constitutionalism

7min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

This chapter delves into the debate between originalism and living constitutionalism, reflecting on the Founding Fathers' views on the Constitution as a dynamic framework. It emphasizes the historical context of 18th-century beliefs and the necessity of adaptation to contemporary values through amendments.

In this episode we sit down with A.J. Jacobs, a journalist who noticed some striking similarities between Biblical fundamentalism and constitutional originalism, and since he once wrote a NYT bestselling book about titled The Year of Living Biblically in which he tried to live for a year as a fundamentalist, he tried to do something similar by living for a year following the Constitution's original meaning as if he were an originalist and then writing a book about it. He soon learned that donning a tricorne hat and marching around Manhattan with a 1700s musket, though fully within one's constitutional rights, will quickly lead to some difficult encounters and altogether strange circumstances.

The Year of Living Constitutionally

AJ Jacobs' Website

AJ Jacobs' Twitter

How Minds Change

David McRaney’s Twitter