The Importance of Quality in Religion

Meyer critiqued what he thought were the two extremes of approaching religious questions, right? The sort of rationalism. I think that's been a good scratcher for all those guys since Aristotle. It's like these guys weren't like the sort of rationalists that Meyer painted there was exactly right. And then he, of course, went after the Fedism, which seems to actually describe Michael Roos's position on religion. He's like an agnostic, Fediest, processed theology guy in his writing. Yeah. Once again, some of the ways, Pat, are views of kind of, you know, the germinate, right? You know, yeah,