The Major Questions Doctrine

The ruling fleshes out this idea of the major questions doctrine. Other agencies have also similar rules on the books that areessentially related to powers they've assumed or created without a whole lot of statutory support. So how will courts in the future use this major question's doctrine to begin to evaluate those rules? That's the 64 thousand dollar question when it comes to this doctrine. Its critics, well, will all point do they all say, well, how do you identify amajor question? I mean, what could be more amorphis than that?