There is something about the nature of anger that makes it a bit more sort of truth tracking. And so be of the empirical facts of how to discussd works, i think that it can actually be used as a debunking argument. But it turns on those empirical facts along the lines of what nitus believes are like marks. Or what happens when you find out that certain deeply held moral convictions have this kind of somewhat idiosyncrocratic cultural history?
What happens when we discover why we believe the things we believe? What if we discover that our values are the product of our cultural tradition, or personal experience, or natural selection? Should we be more skeptical of our values once we learn their history? Plus, data on Google porn searches reveal that you're all a bunch of sick fucks.
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: