Is Disgust a Good Debunking Argument?

There is something about the nature of anger that makes it a bit more sort of truth tracking. And so be of the empirical facts of how to discussd works, i think that it can actually be used as a debunking argument. But it turns on those empirical facts along the lines of what nitus believes are like marks. Or what happens when you find out that certain deeply held moral convictions have this kind of somewhat idiosyncrocratic cultural history?