Good envelo uses evil in the same over generalized way. Despite its readability, and also despite its catchy title, provides no insight into the concept of evil. It's aalec. Don't just alec. Don't devote like, 200 words to, like, taking a pot shot at a fuckin novel. That's like, it's a title. Its goal wasn't to shed light on evil as such, you know, like that's not like l i mad to know t i believe.
David and Tamler descend into the dark pits of Hell to look Satan in the eyes and discover the nature of evil. OK…that’s not fully accurate, we just read and talk about a couple of philosophy articles that analyze the concept. What are the features of evil people and acts? Does evil just mean ‘really really really really bad’ or is it categorically different in some way? Can you be evil without ever actually causing harm? Is Tony Soprano evil?
Plus we take a "moral alignment" quiz (inspired by role playing games like Dungeons and Dragons). We both want to end up as ‘chaotic good’ but does it turn out that way? And what kind of character is a unicorn?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: